*** Product bought with my own money *** (I don't trust reviews on products received as gift, too often they are offered in exchange for fake high rating. I don't do this, I purchase my products, thus my reviews are truly my own, without compromises). Application method : sponge PROS : - slightly thicker-than-liquid texture that glides easily on skin, - stays true-to-tone once set, - dries neither too fast nor to slowly, - sets to a natural matte finish, - better shine control than the previous formula, though not as outstanding as the SoftFlex formula, - only minor creasing, - good transfer-resistance (although not astonishing), - ALMOST fragrance-free, - long-lasting. CONS : - slightly creases and settles into fine/expression lines IMMEDIATELY after application which requires immediate setting with powder on some areas like under the eyes, forehead and smile lines, - medium coverage at best, - non-calibrated shades between "oily" and "dry" formulas, - erratic pattern in the shade range and in the numbering system COMMENTS : I have very oily skin but I can wear indifferently this foundation in both Oily/Combination skin and Normal/Dry skin formulas. Honestly, calling one for oily skin and the other one for dry skin is a nonsense as the latter is not moisturizing in the least, in my opinion these are just twice the same product with only a few tweaks in the formulas to produce slighty different finishes and coverage levels. I've been using Colorstay for 16 years (I began with the SoftFlex formulas when they lauched in 2008). The SoftFlex formula was outstanding, it had iron-like lasting power and was 100% transfer-resistant. Then came the Time Release formula in 2011 (a complete formula change, especially the emulsifying ingredients)… and my 3 years love-story stopped there as the 2011 formulas (both "oily" and "dry") were absolutely horrendous on me, creasing like crazy and transferring onto everything like they never actually set. Between 2011 and 2022 there were some tweaks in the formulas but nothing major nor noticeable. This 2022 formula for oily skin is actually an improvement (for me) over the previous formula. It's better long-lasting and better transfer-resistant than the previous formula, though not quite as good as the SoftFlex formula. As usual, I wear the shade 150 Buff in the "oily" formula, as this has always been my best match. The match is so outstanding than if I miss an area I don't see anything weird, I don't see the foundation at all when I apply it on an area without redness, and on redness-prone area I've just the feeling I'm applying a redness eraser. None of Revlon's competitors has ever produced such a pale shade with olive undertone, most of the time they are too orange or too pink (when I'm lucky I find a true yellow based formula taht I can wear, but it's rare). It has a slightly thicker-than-liquid texture that glides easily on skin (even when spread with a brush). I do prefer a sponge as it meshes better with the skin. It dries neither too slowly nor too fast (and never to the point it flash-dries upon contact with the skin, like a competitor's formula do). It sets to a natural matte finish (more matte than the previous formula), which is an improvement as it is designed for oily skins with unwanted shine. During the setting time it tends to slightly crease on some areas like under the eyes (I don't use concealer, foundation is enough), on the forehead and the smile lines (mine are almost non existent but the slightest creasing emphasizes that this area is not as young as it used to be 20 years ago). So, once blended I dab a clean brush (or my finger) remove any excess product and speed-up the setting process (finger is better for this point), then immediately set with a translucent loose powder. I don't rush to powder the rest of my face as no creasing occurs anywhere else. The color ever-so-slighly darkens during the setting time (which is common, so don't rely on wet swatches to choose your match) but it's barely noticeable with this new formula. Then it stays true-to-tone during its weartime, The previous formula also used to redden while setting, this one doesn't. The shine control is good and, as strange as it sounds, is better with "dry" formula because of its powdery finish. The former Softflex formula for oily skin was much more absorbent and had a far better shine control. Although the word "fragrance" do not appear in the ingredient lists, both formulas are fragranced as they contain ethylene brassylate. While this ingredient gives a gorgeous warm, comforting distinct smell, neither flowery nor sugary (it's found in many foundations from Revlon and competitors) it does not have any other purpose than perfuming. Fortunately, the smell is much lighter than it used to be and is now barely noticeable (I have a sensitive nose, I smell it but it's much much lighter than before). Nonetheless it's something to note for the most sensitive skins/eyes amongst us. The shades are not calibrated between "oily" to "dry" formulas. As an example, Buff in "oily" formula tends to be more olive and half a shade lighter than Buff in "dry" formula. And finally a comment on the chaotic numbering system. The pattern in the shades range has always been the same : the smaller the number the lighter the shade, the bigger the number the darker the shade. But with some new shades launches that occured a few years ago, this pattern is not reliable anymore. I tried the shades 135 Vanilla and 140 Oatmeal, thinking they would be at least as pale as 150 Buff as their numbers are smaller… but nope, they are at least 2 shades darker. On the arms swatches pictures provided by Revlon, the shades are not even listed in ascending order of numbers, and the "smaller number but darker shade" occurs for many other shades than mine. Colorstay has made a huge come back in my bathroom for the better (and everyday use) ♥♥♥

*** Product bought with my own money *** (I don't trust reviews on products received as gift, too often they are offered in exchange for fake high rating. I don't do this, I purchase my products, thus my reviews are truly my own, without compromises). Application method : sponge PROS : - slightly runny (almost oily) texture that glides easily on skin, - stays true-to-tone once set, - dries neither too fast nor to slowly, - sets to a powdery finish with tiny shimmers, - only minor creasing, - good transfer-resistance (although not astonishing), - ALMOST fragrance-free, - long-lasting. CONS : - powdery/chalky/dry-looking finish (whatever the application method is, sheerer with a sponge) that emphasizes flakiness and dry patches (which is not what dry skins need), - non-stabilized formula, - leaves specks of unblended pigments on the face, - slightly creases and settles into fine/expression lines IMMEDIATELY after application which requires immediate setting with powder on some areas like under the eyes, forehead and smile lines, - sheer-to-light coverage at best, - non-calibrated shades between "oily" and "dry" formulas, - erratic pattern in the shade range and in the numbering system COMMENTS : I have very oily skin but I can wear indifferently this foundation in both Oily/Combination skin and Normal/Dry skin formulas. Honestly, calling one for oily skin and the other one for dry skin is a nonsense as the latter is not moisturizing in the least, in my opinion these are just twice the same product with only a few tweaks in the formulas to produce slighty different finishes and coverage levels. I've been using Colorstay for 16 years (I began with the SoftFlex formulas when they lauched in 2008). The SoftFlex formula was outstanding, it had iron-like lasting power and was 100% transfer-resistant. Then came the Time Release formula in 2011 (a complete formula change, especially the emulsifying ingredients)… and my 3 years love-story stopped there as the 2011 formulas (both "oily" and "dry") were absolutely horrendous on me, creasing like crazy and transferring onto everything like they never actually set. Between 2011 and 2022 there were some tweaks in the formulas but nothing major nor noticeable. This 2022 formula for dry skin is not a real improvement over the previous formula. It has a slightly runny texture that glides easily on skin (even when spread with a brush). I do prefer a sponge as it meshes better with the skin. It dries neither too slowly nor too fast (and never to the point it flash-dries upon contact with the skin, like a competitor's formula do). It sets to a powdery finish (weird) which is a nonsense for dry skins. During the setting time it tends to slightly crease on some areas like under the eyes (I don't use concealer, foundation is enough), on the forehead and the smile lines (mine are almost non existent but the slightest creasing emphasizes that this area is not as young as it used to be 20 years ago). So, once blended I dab a clean brush (or my finger) remove any excess product and speed-up the setting process (finger is better for this point), then immediately set with a translucent loose powder. I don't rush to powder the rest of my face as no creasing occurs anywhere else. The color ever-so-slighly darkens during the setting time (which is common, so don't rely on wet swatches to choose your match) but it's barely noticeable with this new formula. Then it stays true-to-tone during its weartime, The previous formula also used to redden while setting, this one doesn't. The shine control is good and, as strange as it sounds, is better with this formula (because of its powdery finish) than the oily skin formula. The former Softflex formula for dry skin was much smoother and had a far better lasting power. Let's note that this formula has a problem that the "oily" formula doesn't share : the pigments stick onto the inner surface of the bottle, giving the illusion it's always full (even when the bottle is actually empty). As these pigments (especially the titanium dioxide) is not suspended in the formula anymore, the color seen from outside the bottle tends to become lighter (almost white) over time, while the actual product that's dispensed becomes darker and sheerer (even less than a tinted serum). The non blended pigments leaving huge white specks on the face in the former "dry" formula has only ever-so-slighty improved : I still see white specks, like tiny sand grains, but I admit that they are tinier than before (LOL). Although the word "fragrance" do not appear in the ingredient lists, both formulas are fragranced as they contain ethylene brassylate. Fortunately, the smell is much lighter than it used to be and is now barely noticeable (I have a sensitive nose, I smell it but it's much much lighter than before). Nonetheless it's something to note for the most sensitive skins/eyes amongst us. The shades are not calibrated between "oily" to "dry" formulas. As an example, Buff in "oily" formula tends to be more olive and half a shade lighter than Buff in "dry" formula. And finally a comment on the chaotic numbering system. The pattern in the shades range has always been the same : the smaller the number the lighter the shade, the bigger the number the darker the shade. But with some new shades launches that occured a few years ago, this pattern is not reliable anymore. I tried the shades 135 Vanilla thinking it would be at least as pale as 150 Buff as its number is smaller… but nope, it is at least 2 shades darker. On the arms swatches pictures provided by Revlon, the shades are not even listed in ascending order of numbers, and the "smaller number but darker shade" occurs for many other shades than mine. Colorstay for dry skin won't get into my bathroom again until all the major problems are fixed.

What happened to the formula?? I've used combination/oily skin for ~10 years. Recently I bought the 180 shade for winter, but I still have the old formula shade 330. The new bottle doesn't apply well, I have to go back in and patch areas. It's oily instead of creamy and it sits into my pores instead of having a smooth finish. It's giving early 2000's foundation. I've had to mix my old and new to help with the consistency but I will have to make the switch I guess.

I, surprisingly, love this foundation. It matches my complexion and shade better than the other expensive brands that I purchase. And, it helps to keep my oil at bay. I am on this site because I haven't seen my shade sold at my local retailers and I want to make sure that it is not being discontinued.

I have had both orders cancelled due to not stock of my ordered items

You should definitely still use more sunscreen as this isn't too good when it comes to spf. It's medium to light coverage but it still looks really nice!! I would say that it's definitely worth it for beginners or light coverage ppl.

Because you guys have DISCONTINUED the 110 Ivory - WHY??? WHY??? There ARE MUCH lighter skin tones out here - We are NOT all olive complexion or dark skin- And OF COURSE just because "I" rate this website as a 1 will NOT change Corporate's view or Marketing Team's decision - So WHY would you even want MY Opinion?

The liquid makeup and lip liner pencil you made a disaster of it by changing ingredients. You have now lost many, many customers.

I hav used Colorstay Longwear Combination/Oily Skin Makeup for years!!! I just purchased "The New" without knowing and instantly upon using it I knew something had changed!! After a week of using I had to look up and see what happened... and this is where I looked up to see. Sure enough, Revlon had to change an already great product. This no longer goes on smoothly, even after putting on a moisturizer before!  The pump even dispenses a huge glob, way more than needed because it's too thick. So very disappointing. Sorry Revlon,I will be in search of an new foundation. No one wants their makeup to look caked on, which is how it looks now.  This used to be such  a great product, with a great price.  Goodbye Revlon :(

Bring back the old formula. It had better coverage. Shade 110 ivory was brighter and better than the current one. I am disappointed with this change. I have been your client for 10 years. Now I've stopped.